Tauranga carpark issues fester on

Bram van Berkel, manager of the Quest Apartments in the Kingsview, is concerned at the impact of a neighbouring carpark building, currently under construction on Durham St.

The Tauranga City Council says it doesn’t have a legal responsibility to mitigate the impact of the stalled Harington Street carpark project for apartment owners in an adjacent building.

However, it will play ‘good neighbour’ by continuing discussions with apartment owners in the Kingsview Towers in Durham Street to understand the effect of the carpark development on their properties.

The council was responding to complaints from 12 property owners on the ground and first floors of the Kingsview Towers on Durham street whose views over the Strand, inner harbour and Matapihi have been obliterated by the carpark. Other properties up to the sixth floor will have their views blocked to various degrees.

“Views which had been paid for by apartment owners,” says Bram van Berkel, himself an apartment owner and manager of the Quest Apartments in the Kingsview.  In an earlier The Weekend Sun story, he had expressed his disappointment.

“We never really fully understood the abnormality of what we were dealing with.”

Responding to The Weekend Sun story, the council says LIM documents that have been available since 2003, included the wording that the land (adjoining Kinsgview) had been ear-marked for a multi-storey parking building. It also said: “any such building may incorporate other activities, eg: office accommodation, to maximise utilisation of the site”.

At that stage the actual height and use of any future building was yet to be determined.

It was claimed the original carpark concept was for two storeys above ground level, revised upward to nine and subsequently downward to seven after protest from a body corporate. However, TCC project manager, Steve Wiggill, says in 2004 the development concept was eight levels plus a roof structure.

“The final design is seven levels above ground and two underground. At no stage since the initial concept was developed in 2004, has the design been reduced to two levels.”

He says the current height is within the city plan permitted height of 49 metres above sea level.

It was also suggested the council might like to upgrade lighting and air conditioning in the worst affected apartments to combat coldness and dampness created by the carpark in winter.

“While there is no liability on council, we are open to considering reasonable options that would mitigate the impact of the development that don’t already exist through the planning provisions.”

 The apartment owners also believe the ‘new CBD’ is more towards Cameron Road and the carpark would be better off at the southern end of the city centre. However Steve Wiggill says there’s a high demand for car parking in the city centre. “With the number of developments planned, the impact on the city’s parking and demand will continue to increase. And the carpark is expected to be fully utilised once completed.”

Meantime the Harington Street carpark remains in mothballs because of design issues.

“We’re working on a solution,” says Steve. “But our intent is to deliver on the original scope of the project.”

That’s a carpark with space for 250 bicycles and 550 cars. The council did not respond to part of a question relating to who would pay for the ‘design issues’.

More on SunLive...
You must be logged in to make a comment. Login Now


Posted on 17-02-2020 14:04 | By Told you

This car park building should never of been built on this site,not only has it ruined these people’s investment but ruined their lives. There are other sites more suitable for a car park a crazy decision by the council.

Sales and Purchase

Posted on 30-01-2020 12:22 | By Frostbite

Go back and read the original documents.All purchasers of these apartments were told that they would lose their view. sometime in the future. Simple

Get a grip Bram

Posted on 28-01-2020 06:26 | By

I think there is no way the ratepayers of Tauranga should pay for an upgrade to lighting and air conditioning in the apartments. Those who brought them should have done their due diligence. The car park is lower than the original concept and in the city plan that lot could have been something much higher (which it should be so we better use space).

Get on with it

Posted on 27-01-2020 20:52 | By Eric Bantona

Stop whinging and looking for rate payer money / compensation. Apartment owners should have done their own due diligence or Bram Stoker should have provided the LIM to prospective buyers. Just build it and let them whinge. They have no leg to stand on from a legal point of view. Classic nimbyism, belief of entitlement and privilege. This needs to be built for the city. Get that thing constructed and move on. Don’t give them anything. If they can afford an apartment with harbour views, they don’t need further handouts when there is no legal requirement to do so.

Inner city blues

Posted on 27-01-2020 13:08 | By Kancho

Sadly nothing new. This happens everywhere due to the zoning of land use. Often in city commercial zone which means buildings very close or touching. Views are not guaranteed in this instance as many in Auckland and elsewhere will tell you. I looked briefly at apartment living and decided the cons outweigh the pros, but apartments may still suit some for proximity etc. I shudder at body corporate fees, maintenance, insurance, water, parking etc etc. all on the rise.