Principals seek guidance as student strike planned

Mike Williams is the president of the Secondary Principals' Association. Photo: Supplied/RNZ

Principals are facing a dilemma over next month's school strike for climate change - should they punish students who wag school to protest, or encourage them?

Strike organisers say students from about 100 schools had signed up for the event on March 15 and principals say they had asked the Education Ministry for guidance.

One of the organisers of the strike in New Zealand, Sophie Handford, says she’s not aware of any schools forbidding students from participating in the event.

"We've found a good mix - some wondering how it will fit into the curriculum, others not willing to be seen supporting it but they are kind of supporting it in the background. [At] some schools, the principals are really supportive," she says.

Sophie says some students are worried about missing a day of lessons or being recorded as truant and she urged them to consider what lack of action on climate change would mean for their future.

She says the strike had clear goals.

"We would like our government and governments worldwide to do everything in their power to limit global warming to no more than 1.5C because we know that once we get over that point of warming we are pretty much destined for catastrophic climate change and [there's] no turning back," Sophie says.

"This involves stopping all exploration for more fossil fuels and regulation [of] emissions from agriculture as well."

The ministry says it would provide schools with information but indicated that the strike could fall within the parameters of the curriculum.

Its deputy secretary, early learning and student achievement, Ellen MacGregor-Reid, says the curriculum included awareness of the environment and encouraged students to "take action as critical, informed and responsible citizens".

"As part of their curriculum schools may want to follow up on their students' interest in social issues such as climate change. This can include discussion of ways they might raise awareness of these critical issues in their communities, including costs and benefits of any proposed action," she says.

Secondary Principals' Association president Mike Williams says schools might be lenient with students who were active on environmental issues but would take a hard line if they thought students were just trying to get a day off school.

"It really needs to be a school-by-school decision about how they manage it," says Mike.

"If you're in a school environment where you're heavily into environmental sustainability, got very active student groups who have been working on this for a while, then you might be a lot more lenient about how you handle it."

"But if it hasn't been a school focus, the school community hasn't been involved and suddenly they want to go on a strike day you're going to be a lot less sympathetic to the cause."

Mike says schools might consider allowing some students to attend the climate strike for a limited amount of time.

New Zealand Secondary School Principals' Association Canterbury and West Coast president Phil Holstein says strike organisers sent schools in the region an email telling them the strike would be happening and asking them to inform their students.

He says that was an unusual approach and the association had asked the ministry for guidance.

"Principals are saying 'well how best do we respond to this' because this would be perhaps unprecedented the way it's come about," says Phil.

"I don't disagree with the intent at all, but it's the process that has caused the dilemma among principals."

-RNZ/John Gerritsen

More on SunLive...
You must be logged in to make a comment. Login Now

Completely pointless

Posted on 04-03-2019 10:59 | By Bay Citizen

This "strike" is a ridiculous stunt. How is it even supposed to achieve anything? Or are we meant to take leave of our senses and let children decide complex scientific and political decisions? In any case, this Sophie character who is organising the strike seems to epitomise the very worst of the climate change debate with scaremongering and doomsday scenarios that she asserts as facts when the truth is that forecasting decades into the future is far beyond her (or anyone’s) wit to understand fully. Perhaps a little humility and acknowledgement of the uncertainties might actually persuade the sceptics more effectively than nonsense hockey stick graphs and the like.

What's the problem

Posted on 03-03-2019 14:58 | By astex

It’s simple. These kids will be bunking school and should be treated accordingly. Most of them would not even have an understanding of their own argument. Do they understand about consequences of what they demand. Job losses, increased power costs etc?